Help Pass the International Whale Conservation and Protection Act of 2009


Japan, Norway, Iceland and their cohorts are working to undermine the ban or trying to find loopholes to kill even more whales. It’s not enough that Japan kills hundreds of whales every year for “scientific” purposes (and then sells the meat commercially). They now want to allow full-out commercial coastal whaling, where small boats of whalers can kill hundreds of additional whales.

Unfortunately, the United States, once a world leader in whale protection, has been failing to stand up to these countries.

But, there are two ways you can encourage the U.S. to stand strong:

The International Whale Conservation and Protection Act of 2009 (H.R. 2455), introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 18, would be a major step towards giving whales the protection they deserve. If passed, the bill would make the U.S. a leader again by strengthening whale conservation, research, and protection efforts. Plus, it would firmly reassert the United States’ opposition to commercial whaling while working to improve the transparency of the IWC.

Whales need all the help they can get from the U.S. at the IWC meeting this year. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which focuses on protecting the planet’s oceans and atmosphere, could -- and should -- make a stronger case for conservation. The NOAA needs to show other countries the way and create a global sanctuary for whales.

Please take a minute to request that the U.S. do its part to ensure the future existence of whales.

TAKE ACTION
Please tell your U.S. Representative to support H.R. 2455, the International Whale Conservation and Protection Act of 2009, and do all he or she can to pass this important legislation. You can reach your legislator through the Capitol switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or click here to look up your Representative and the office phone number.

Learn more at HSI

About Whaling


Whales have been killed by nearly every method imaginable—from explosive harpoons and cold harpoons to electric lances and bullets. No matter what method is used, however, death is almost never instantaneous. Instead, the whale may suffer anywhere from a few minutes to several hours.

By 1982, most whale species were so devastated that the International Whaling Commission (IWC) declared a moratorium on all commercial hunting. In defiance of the moratorium, Norway returned to commercial whaling in 1993. Japan has continued whaling under the guise of "scientific research." In both countries whales are killed for human consumption and for consumer products. In neither country are these products a necessity. In fact, whale meat and blubber are expensive luxury items, particularly in Japan.

All methods of killing whales are inhumane because, among other problems, they do not render the animals instantaneously insensible. The large size of even the smallest species of whales, their remarkable adaptations for diving, and the weather and conditions at sea make it impossible to kill whales humanely or instantaneously. What's more, according to published studies, whalers identify death as the cessation of movement in external body parts such as the pectoral flipper—not the cessation of cerebral function. Therefore, whales, who are sentient, intelligent mammals, may suffer horrible and often prolonged deaths due to the unreliable and brutal killing methods used.

Killing Methods

Explosive harpoons. This method uses a large spear tipped with a penthrite grenade that explodes on impact. Accurate execution of this method is nearly impossible given the conditions at sea. Even so, this device is supposed to cause "instantaneous" death (defined as death within ten seconds or fewer). Although this method could immediately kill the whale if the projectile pierced directly through the heart or brain, the average time to death is about four minutes, and some whales live for well over an hour after the grenade has exploded.

Cold harpoons. This method uses a propulsive device (similar to a bazooka) to launch a large spear into the whale. The spear, which does not have an exploding tip, penetrates deeply into the whale's body. If the spear does not hit a vital organ—the most likely result—the whale will not die from the impact of the harpoon, but instead will bleed to death, sometimes over several hours. The IWC currently outlaws cold harpoons; however, some explosive harpoons do not detonate upon impact, resulting in a "cold harpoon" death.

Electric lances. The Japanese have used this "secondary" method of killing after initially using an explosive harpoon. Because explosive harpoons damage much of the muscle (meat) in the area of impact, whalers are reluctant to use two grenades on one whale when death is not instantaneous. A whale who survives an explosive harpoon strike is dragged back to the ship and secured alongside it. An electric charge is then shot through the whale, which is supposed to induce instant death. However, the voltage of the electric charge is insufficient to cause immediate death (even when applied directly through the brain or heart) and merely adds to the whale's agony. The Japanese claim to have ceased use of the electric lance in response to humane concerns, but with no international observers, if and under what circumstances it continues to be used are impossible to verify.

Bullets. This "secondary" method of killing involves shooting the whale if instantaneous death does not result from an explosive harpoon. Some whalers have been known to use machine guns or anti-tank rifles, because of a whale's great size. Killing a whale with a single bullet is virtually impossible; even using an anti-tank rifle, which fires large caliber bullets, requires multiple shots. Therefore, most whalers, particularly the Norwegians, "finish off" the whale by riddling the animal with standard caliber bullets. The whale feels pain from each wound and may not die for some time.

Resources:
HSI
International Whaling Commission

Japan Begins Cruel Whale Hunt Again

Nov. 19th, 2008
The clock is ticking for whales this week as the Japanese ready their harpoons for the five-month long whaling season during which they will kill hundreds of whales in the waters of the Southern Antarctic Ocean -- an IWC-designated whale sanctuary.

Last year, Japan killed 551 minke whales in the Antarctic, well below the country's self-allotted quota. This year Japan plans to kill more than 900 minke whales and 50 fin whales in the sanctuary. There were press statements that Japan, for a number of valid reasons, including lack of market demand for whale meat, was going to reduce its hunt this year by about 20 percent. Japan denied the press reports, saying it had every intention of taking the full quota. In the same week of denying a more moderate stance by reducing its kill quota, Japan announced that it has granted an import license for more than 65 tons of whale meat which has been sitting in customs since it was sent there from Iceland and Norway last summer.

Some of this whale meat will be served in schools and sold to restaurants and other vendors, while most of the meat will go unused and stored in a warehouse in order to keep alive the cruel, unnecessary and outdated practice of killing whales.

"Japan, though bound by the moratorium on commercial whaling passed by the IWC in 1982, continues to kill whales by exploiting a provision in the 1946 International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling that allows a government to kill whales for scientific research," said Kitty Block, vice president for Humane Society International. "By claiming its whaling is for research, Japan has been able to kill more than 15,000 whales since the moratorium was implemented in 1986."

Moreover, studies have shown that much of the whale meat sold in Japanese markets contains high levels of contaminants such methyl mercury. Also, whale meat consumption only became widespread in Japan after World War II, when food was scarce. Now, with risks to both human health and whale populations, there is no need to carry on this inhumane and unnecessary practice that causes the cruel death of hundreds of whales every year, according to HSI.

Scientists Find Whales Innocent of Global Decline in Fisheries

The argument that great whales are behind declining fish stocks has absolutely no scientific foundation, according to leading researchers and members of conservation organizations who spoke at the International Whaling Commission's 60th meeting today in Santiago, Chile.

In its opening day, representatives from Humane Society International, World Wildlife Fund and the Lenfest Ocean Program presented three reports debunking the science behind "whales-eat-fish" claims often made by whaling nations Japan, Norway and Iceland. Such arguments have been used to bolster support for whaling, particularly from developing nations.

"It is not the whales, it is overfishing and excess fishing capacity that are responsible for diminishing supplies of fish in developing countries," said fisheries biologist Dr. Daniel Pauly, director of the University of British Columbia Fisheries Centre. "Making whales into scapegoats serves only to benefit wealthy whaling nations while harming developing nations by distracting any debate on the real causes of the declines of their fisheries."

Who's eating all the fish? The food security rationale for culling cetaceans examines the final destination of catches from coastal fisheries in the South Pacific, Caribbean and West Africa. Less than half the catch goes to domestic markets and the majority of the catch supplies markets of affluent countries in the European Union, Japan, North America and, increasingly, China. "One can speak of fish migrating from the more needy to the less needy," the report states.

Also presented to the IWC Scientific Committee were the preliminary results from an analysis of the interaction between whales and commercial fisheries in Northwest Africa. The modeling, supported by the Lenfest Ocean Program, shows no real competition between local or foreign fisheries and great whales.

The great whales spend only a few months in the area during their vast seasonal migrations, eat relatively little while breeding and tend to consume fundamentally different types of food resources than the marine species targeted by both local and foreign fisheries. When models are designed which presume that whales are eating species important to the fishing industry, those models still fail to show that great whales are a significant source of competition to fishing, the report concluded.

Also released today is a review of the scientific literature originating from Japan and Norway, the two countries most strongly promoting the idea that whales pose problems for fisheries. The review, funded by WWF, found significant flaws in much of the science and concluded that "where good data are available, there is no evidence to support the contention that whale predation presents an ecological issue for fisheries."

Dr. Susan Lieberman of WWF said, "These three reports provide yet more conclusive evidence that great whales are not responsible for the degraded state of the world's fisheries. It is now time for governments to focus on the real reason for fisheries decline — unsustainable fishing operations."

Patricia Forkan, president of Humane Society International, said, "Dr. Pauly's findings should refute, once and for all, the misconception that whales are eating all the fish and need to be killed to protect the world's fisheries."

Resources:
HSI
International Whaling Commission

Save the Whales


Join the swell of international pressure by sending
a virtual origami whale to the Japanese prime
Minister to ask him to stop whaling. Create your Whale

Please sign this petition to add your voice to those calling for a South Atlantic Whale Sanctuary.

IFAW's Global Whale Ambassador, Pierce Brosnan speaks on behalf of the world's whales and in support of the International Fund for Animal Welfare's efforts on their behalf.

Sign Petition to Save Whales targeted to the International Whaling Commission